The article substantiates the high information potential of the results of administrative activities and draws attention to the lack of a regulatory framework for their use as full-fledged means of criminal procedural evidence. At the same time, practical technologies have been identified that allow employees of preliminary investigation bodies and the court to overcome existing gaps in regulatory regulation, primarily the well-known applied algorithm, which consists of positioning the results of administrative activities under the guise of the results of operational investigative activities. Based on a critical assessment of such technologies, the article formulates a conclusion about the need to introduce approaches into doctrine, legislation and law enforcement practice that are based on an understanding of the results of administrative activities as autonomous means of criminal procedural evidence.
|
