ИНТЕРНЕТ, ГРАЖДАНСКОЕ ОБЩЕСТВО И ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЕ УЧАСТИЕ ГРАЖДАН |
| 2 | |
| 2014 |
| научная статья | 323 | ||
| 339-343 | гражданское общество, политическое участие, интернет-пространство, национальная инновационная система, управление инновационными процессами, управление рисками, государство |
| Рассматривается одна из наиболее актуальных проблем современной политологии. Включение в анализ влияния Интернета на политическое участие граждан позволяет проследить процесс изменения основ власти и её управленческих практик. Политическая роль Интернета находится в центре внимания. |
 |
| 1 . Балуев Д.Г. Политическая роль социальных медиа как поле научного исследования // Образовательные технологии и общество (EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY), 2013. Т. 16. № 2. С. 604-616. 2 . Putnan R. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon &Shuster. 2000. 3 . Norris P., Benett W.L., Entman R.M. Virtuous Circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 4 . Rheingold H. The virtual community: Finding connection in computerized world. London: Minerva, 1995. 5 . Toffler A., Toffler H. Creating a new civilization: The politics of the third wave. Atlanta, GA: Turner Publications, 1955. 6 . Negroponte N. Being Digital. London: Coronet, 1995. 7 . Rash W. Politic on the nets: Wiring the political process. New York: W.H.Freeman, 1997. 8 . Dyson E. Release 2.1:Adisign for living in the digital age. London: Penguin, 1998. 9 . Mulgan G., Adonis A. Back to Greece: the scope for direct democracy// Demos quarterly 3:2-9, 1994. 10 . Heilemann J. Old politics RIP// Wired. 1996. № 4 (11). 11 . Poster M. Cyber democracy: The internet and the public sphere. Holmes D (ed) Virtual politics: Identity and community in cyberspace. London: Sage, 1997. 12 . Wu W., Weaver D. On-line democracy or On demagoguery?: Public opinion Polls on the Internet// Harvard International Journal of Press/ Politics. 1996. № 2 (4). 13 . Street J. Politics and technology. New York: Guildorf Press, 1992. 14 . Lipow A., Seyd P. The politics of anti-partysm// Parliamentary Affairs. 1996. № 49 (2). 15 . Etzioni A., Etzioni O. Face-to-face and computer mediated countries. A comparative analisys// 9 Annual conference on computers, freedom and privacy. University of Texas: Austin, 1999. 16 . Streck J. Pulling the plug on electronic town meetings: Participatory democracy and the reality of usenet. London: Routlege, 1999. 17 . Sunstein C. Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001. 18 . Wilhelm A.G. Democracy in the digital age: challenges to political life in cyberspace. New York: Routledge, 2000. 19 . Lessig L. Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: basic books, 1999. 20 . Bimber B. The Internet and political transformation: populism, community and accelerated pluralism//Politi 31 (1), 1998.; Hill K. and Hughes J. Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of Internet. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998; Davis R. and Owen D. New Media and American Politics, New York: Oxford University Press, 1998; Margolis M. and Resnick D. Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace 'Revolution', London: Sage, 2000; Norrs P. Digital Divide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001; Schuefele D.A. and Nisbet M.C. Being a Citizen Online: New Opportunities and Dead Ends// Harvard Journal of Press/Politics 7 (3): Р. 55-75. 21 . Pew research center for the people and the press. One in ten voters online for campaign 96. Washington: DC, Pew research center for the people and the press, 1996. 22 . Norris P. Digital divide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 23 . Boggs C. The great Retreat: decline of the public sphere in late 20 century America// Theory and society. 1997. № 26. 24 . Nie N.H. and Erbring L. Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Quantitative Study of society, 2000. 25 . Cummings J., Butler B., Kraut R. The quality of on-line relationship //Communications of the ACM. 2002. № 45 (7). 26 . Putnan R. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon &Shuster, 2000. 27 . Uslaner E. Trust, Civic Engagement and the Internet// European consortium of Political Research, Grenoble, 2011. 28 . Wellman B., Quan Haas, Wite J., Hampton K. Does the internet increase, decrease or supplement social capital?// American Behavioral Scientist. 2000. № 45 (3). 29 . Weber L., Loumake A., Bergman J. Who participates and why?: an analysis of citizens on the Internet and the mass public// Social Science Computer Review. 2003. № 21 (1). 30 . Gibson R.K. Elections On-line: Assessing internet voting in light of Arizona Democratic Primary// Political Science Quarterly. 2001. № 116 (4). 31 . Solop F. Digital democracy comes of age: Internet voting and Arizona 2000 Democaratic Primary Elections// PS Online. 2001. № 34 (2). 32 . Tolbert C., Mossberger K., McNeal R. Beyond the digital divide: Exploring attitudes about information technology, political participation and electronic government. Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston: MA, 2003. 33 . Krueger B. Assessing the potential of internet Political Participation in the United States: A resource approach// American Politics Research. 2002. № 30 (5). 34 . Кабешев Р.В., Рыхтик М.И. Политика в области высшего образования стран Запада в контексте инновационного процесса // Мир науки, культуры, образования. 2012. № 2. С. 494-496. |