The article analyzes the existing legal regulation of the restoration of the rights of a rehabilitated person. The article analyzes judicial practice in the field of compensation for damage caused by erroneous administrative coercion, using the example of the cases of the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. The question of the grounds for compensation for harm is being investigated, and in particular, whether the termination of the case in itself due to the absence of an offense is a sufficient basis for civil liability of the state. The author explores the prevailing approach in judicial practice, sees a tendency to move to a stricter understanding of state responsibility in this area and suggests ways to improve legal regulation and law enforcement in the analyzed category of cases.
|
