The significance of this article lies in the absence of consistent legislative frameworks for regulating digital and virtual entities, despite their longstanding presence. Participants in transactions rely on ambiguous judicial practice and deliberations by legal scholars and practitioners as there is no clear legal framework. This situation does not contribute to the stability of transactions. Although there are numerous publications on this topic, doctrinal consensus has not been established. In this article, the authors arrive at two main conclusions: the necessity to establish a definitive classification of virtual property as one of the types of civil rights objects, requiring a restructuring of civil law regulation, and the potential application of the concept of quasi-proprietary rights to virtual property.
|
