A fundamentally new approach to the analysis of the so-called legal language is described. Some terms and
notions of the criminal justice institute of ЃcomplicityЃ are studied (Ѓorganizer of a crimeЃ, Ѓperpetrator of a crimeЃ,
ЃinstigatorЃ, ЃhelperЃ) along with the terms nominating various forms of organized crime. For solving the problems
that at first glance seem to be purely of a terminological nature, we had to resort to the methods of discourse analysis.
The chosen methodological approach and research results demonstrate a failure of the conventional methods of
terminology and jurisprudence.
|
